Australian cricket


Marvellous. The Canary Yellows have just been beaten in the second ODI final by India, and consequently lose their second Commonwealth Bank series in a row. Another example of peaking at the wrong time methinks ;-)

The most outstanding moment from today’s match featured Andrew Symonds putting a streaker on his backside. Got him, yes! Clip below features commentary from the Channel 9 team, listen to Mark Nicholas state that you “can’t take your eyes off a single ball”, and Richie Benaud’s dry retort.

I’ve had the privilege of watching Adam Gilchrist play live on a number of occasions, including the 133 he scored at the SCG when England finally won a game on the 2002/03 Ashes tour. It was much closer to home though that I first saw him play, and boy (note the Mark Nicholasesque superlative), could he play!

Young Australia was playing a Derbyshire side that included Devon Malcolm and Dominic Cork at Chesterfield in a three day game. Gilchrist was the standout player for the Junior Canaries, who also included MTG Elliot, Ricky Ponting, Stuey Law and Matthew Hayden amongst its ranks.

On a pacey track, Gilchrist blasted a rapid unbeaten 105. The way he dealt with Malcolm was incredible. Smacking him time and time again into the duck pond, endangering the lives and limbs of those wandering past. Malcolm kept bouncing him and Gilly kept hooking him off his nose for what seemed like miles.

It was a cracking game, Young Australia won by 4 wickets, although the result was irrelevant. I had seen a (young) master at work, and his retirement, while giving us an even better chance at winning back the Ashes next year, is a loss to cricket lovers around the world.

Gilchrist - annotations by SMH

When the FT chooses to comment on cricket, it tends to do it thoughtfully and only when there is real need. Sundeep Tucker’s article today outlines the issues underlying Monkeygate and other fallout from the current Australia v India series.

Some highlights:

Something unexpected happened in Australia. Far from showering one-eyed praise on the team for achieving a world record-equalling 16th successive Test match victory, fans and former players have lined up to excoriate the side for being bad sports. Newspaper polls showed overwhelming disgust at the Australian team’s conduct, while cricket writers have demanded Ricky Ponting be sacked as captain.

India, perversely, has witnessed an outpouring of ugly nationalism, with effigies of the match umpires publicly torched to satisfy a baying 24-hour media. The public wants the team to abort the tour, claiming that the nation is being humiliated. For this, the BCCI must shoulder the blame.

…but words are likely to result in a three match ban!

Yep, first the Canary Yellow’s complain that Harbhajan Singh called Andrew Symonds a “monkey” (I called my son a “cheeky monkey” this morning, does that mean I’ll have to miss nets for a month?). And now the Indians have hit back, accusing Brad Hogg of making an offensive remark to Anil Kumble and Mahendra Singh Dhoni during India’s second innings.

Racism should be condemned, and has no part to play in society, but it is interesting that it is the Canary Yellow’s getting upset about a few words. I do remember once being called a c**t six times in an over by a particularly articulate Aussie pro during a pre-season friendly a couple of years back, and the likes of Merv Hughes and Glen McGrath were infamous for their use of cunning linguistics! You’d have thought it would be best to let things lie in the field of play.

Allan Border and Steve Waugh have suggested that cultural misunderstandings could have contributed to the race row boiling over to the point of India suspending their tour. I would suggest that it is more likely to be a lack of culture causing most of the problems in Australia!

So Steve Bucknor has been removed as a standing umpire from the Perth Test because the Indians got pissy that he made some bad decisions in the last Test. OK, he got one or two wrong, and that may well have cost India the match, however the fallibility of sporting officials is for better or worse part of the game. Players make mistakes and umpires make mistakes. It happens, get over it. What I find hugely worrying is the ability of the BCCI to kick up a stink and get Bucknor - one of the world’s best and most respected umpires - effectively suspended for a match. Pakistan did the same in 2006. When they refused to take to the field and forfeited the Test against England (the lost coverage of which I have never been recompensed for by Sky) it resulted in the end of Darryl Hair’s career.

You get it drummed into you as a kid, the umpire’s word is final. He is the arbiter. I’m sure the Indians are most upset that Bucknor got some decisions wrong. However, they, like every cricket side, appeal vociferously for everything they can, put pressure on the umpires to make decisions in their favour (even though at times they know it to be wrong). If you are going to do that, you need to be more relaxed about it when decisions don’t go in your favour. To use some clichés: its swings and roundabouts, it all evens up in the end, you win some you lose some!

The ICC is in danger of appearing to be a cowardly and feckless organisation that doesn’t operate for the best of the game, only to safeguard itself and its revenues. It needs to grow some teeth and use them before the game dances entirely to the tune of those with the biggest wallet.

First up, big congrats to Muttiah Muralitharan for retaining the most test wickets record. Am sure there will be plenty said by Australian correspondents to diminish this achievement, and I look forward to a “chucker” versus the “drug cheat” discussion at a later stage. For the record, TVC has no issues with Murali’s bowling action, or the fact that Shane Warne took a banned diuretic to aid his recovery from a shoulder injury.

However, TVC is a touch concerned about how the Test in Kandy is shaping up. Should Sri Lanka post England anything more than 200 to chase in the final innings we could be struggling.

Muralitharan

Crikey, as the man who met a stringray might have said, international relations between two of the world’s most famous commentators and former cricketing adversaries have hit rock bottom as a new war of words reverberates around the planet, and it is all over the papers.

The Guardian: Ian Chappell yesterday launched an astonishing verbal attack on cricket’s newest knight, Sir Ian Botham, labelling the record-breaking former England all-rounder a liar and saying the decision to award him a knighthood will be regretted.

The Telegraph: Former Australia captain Ian Chappell has accused Sir Ian Botham of “peddling lies” over a bar-room brawl between the pair 30 years ago. In his latest autobiography, ‘Head On’, former all-rounder Botham has again claimed he “flattened” Chappell at a Melbourne bar in 1977 because he was ridiculing English cricket.

Sir Beef’s retort to the claims: “Ian Chappell worries me about as much as a cold. I couldn’t care less what he says.”

Writing in Canary Yellow gossip rag (oops.. sorry, Australia’s most respected news and current affairs magazine for 127 years) The Bulletin, Chappell labelled Sir Beef’s tale of flattening the former Australian captain in a Melbourne bar-brawl “a load of bollocks”. The following is in Chappell’s words:

The book recycles another version of our 1977 spat with added twists. He relates how, during the Centenary Test - it was actually a month earlier, during a Sheffield Shield match between Queensland and Victoria - I started rubbishing English cricket in a bar. “I gave him three official warnings,” writes Botham, “all of which he ignored, so the next time he started, I just flattened him. He went flying over a table and crash-landed on a group of Aussie Rules footballers, spilling their drinks in the process”.

After explaining how I bolted for the door, he couldn’t contain his Superman self-image, describing how he “at once set off in hot pursuit, chasing him down the street and even hurdling the bonnet of a passing car”.

Apart from having us in the same bar, the rest is a fairytale. How did we happen to be together in a bar in Melbourne in 1977?

Botham was in Australia on a Whitbread scholarship playing for Melbourne University in the VCA district competition. I was playing for North Melbourne and the previous Saturday - the first of a two-day contest - Botham had injured his shoulder batting and had his arm in a sling. I was rather surprised then to discover that when University had to bowl one over later that afternoon, it was Botham who took the new ball.

The following Friday night I arrived at the MCG bar, a small hotel next to the Hilton, and the young Englishman was boasting in a very loud voice that he could drink Australian beer all night and it had no effect on him.

This amused rather than bothered me, but I did become extremely annoyed when he accused me of verbally abusing him during an Australia v Somerset match. He said that “as a number 11″ he didn’t mind a bit of abuse, but when I had said to him “Does your mother f***?”, that was going too far.

I told him I didn’t believe anyone should stoop so low on a cricket field by making those type of remarks. I then pointed out to him that I’d only played against Somerset in 1968, and as English counties weren’t known for their youth policies I doubted he was in the side at age 12.

He was adamant I’d abused him, and when I asked for an apology, he refused. He then accused me of retiring from cricket to avoid the upcoming tour to England where “every fast bowler was looking to knock my block off”.

As I’d faced the English speedsters John Snow, Bob Willis and Alan Ward in their prime I felt entitled to brush that one aside, which I did with a few uncomplimentary remarks. Botham now began to have second thoughts about who had abused him in the Somerset match and said: “It might have been someone who looked like you.”

I’d had enough of his bullshit by this stage, and said: “I gave you the chance to apologise and you didn’t, so you can f*** off.”

With that, he put an empty beer glass against my face and threatened: “I’ll cut you from ear to ear.”

“That will only confirm you are a coward,” I said. “It will mean more if you cut me with a cricket ball tomorrow and I’ll give you every chance, because I’m going to bat all adjectival day.”

I was leaning back in my chair at the time and, when he pushed me in the chest, I fell backwards. As I got up, he suggested we settle it outside to which I replied: “I don’t fight. You either finish up in jail or hospital and I don’t intend visiting either over a c*** like you.”

I turned and headed outside where he yelled something about knocking my block off the next day. As I was walking across Wellington Street, I turned and replied: “What, with your sore arm and all, Deary?”

With that, he became enraged and the former Australian fast bowler Ian Callen had to restrain him by clutching him in a bear hug.

We did battle the next day on the cricket pitch and, while batting for around 40 minutes against Botham, there were no bouncers. I was then dismissed by Graham Stevenson - another Englishman here on a scholarship - incorrectly given out caught behind. I’ve never been so pissed off about getting a bad decision in my life.

Is it me, or is the Indian cricket team changed in attitude of late? India has always been a side of supremely talented cricketers, and once Ganguly took over the captaincy, they also seemed to add to that in some way with attitude. The addition of some serious back-bone made them less beatable away from home, and much more competitive.

However, have they gone too far? I am not usually one to back up the Australians, however some of the scenes in the match yesterday were more spicy than a dodgy backstreet tindaloo. The cricket should be the main attraction, not the childish antics of certain Indian players. Other sides are not competely innocent here, and a bit of attitude can make things interesting, however, this bad “I’m bigger than the game” behaviour seems to be a more common theme with India at the moment - and India’s media agrees.

Fair play to Dhoni and Dravid, who stepped in to calm matters down. I can’t help thinking that they must be tired of those hotheaded teammates of theirs that behave more like spoilt Premiership footballers than respected International cricketers. Have lavish celebrity lifestyles and the adoration of millions caused the likes of Harbhajan and Sreesanth to become so arrogant that they risk shaming India’s proud cricketing reputation?

Its a funny old game. In a little over 24 hours England’s bright young hope with the ball was being pumelled for the first set of six sixes against a major international side, by an Indian side that looked like they’d be joining England on the plane out. Just over a day later and it is the Saffas that are using the exit door and taking an early trip to Maverick’s. The perpetual chokers lived up to their tag and capitulated against the Indians. Sri Lanka also crashed out, after being boshed by the Canary Yellows. This is a great tournament.

Shane Watson - poor Aussie all-rounderA world apart in terms of location and talent (yes, Luke Wright is that good), The Village Cricketer has noticed a striking resemblance betwen Sussex and England batting all-rounder Luke Wright and Queensland and Australia all-rounder Shane Watson. Both blonde, both open the batting in one-day matches and both bowl a bit of medium-pace. Watson’s international career should be behind him cos he ain’t very good and even the Aussies don’t like him, Wright’s career is laid out in front of him after he was named in TVC’s team to win the next World Cup.

Luke Wright - very good

Luke Wright - very good

Shane Watson - not very goodShane Watson - not very good

Shane Watson - not very good

Next Page »